Clinical
Findings supported by randomised, controlled trials in humans, with pre-registered endpoints and published results.
Randomised human trialsStrongest available signal
The peptide intelligence library
Ask anything about peptides.
Every answer names the evidence tier it rests on, and says plainly when the research is thin.
Free to ask. No account required. Not medical advice.
THE RESEARCH ATLAS
From molecule to evidence.
- Compound profiles
- 149
- Research areas
- 21
Across human biology.
- Citations indexed
- 554
Connected to the source.
- Evidence tiers
- 4
- Clinical
- Human-limited
- Animal
- Anecdotal
Evidence grading
Four tiers. No blending,
no averaging, no hedging.
Most sources flatten a rodent study and a randomised trial into the same confident sentence. We refuse to. Each statement on a profile is tagged with the strength of the evidence behind it, and the tag travels with the claim wherever it appears.
15 profiles
Human-limited
Human data that exists but is thin: open-label work, single-arm studies, small cohorts, or observational follow-up without randomisation.
Small or observationalSuggestive, not settled
Animal
Evidence drawn from in vivo animal models or in vitro systems. Mechanistically informative; translation to humans is unproven.
Preclinical modelsMechanism only
Anecdotal
Case reports, clinician notes, and user-reported outcomes. Recorded for completeness and labelled plainly so it is never mistaken for data.
Reports and self-reportLowest confidence
A worked example
Two compounds in this registry are described online in almost identical language. One has twenty-four randomised trials and published cardiovascular outcome data. The other has ninety-six rodent studies and no completed randomised trial in humans. Both are catalogued here with the difference stated on the first line rather than buried in the footnotes.
Clinical
Semaglutide
24 randomised trials
Animal
BPC-157
0 randomised trials
Research areas
Twenty-one fields, one standard.
From metabolic regulation to ophthalmic repair. Each area is curated by reviewers who read the primary literature, and each profile inside it is graded the same way.
Metabolic Health
22Blood sugar and energy
Open areaRecovery
26Bounce back after training
Open areaHealing & Repair
12Recover from injury faster
Open areaFocus & Memory
15Sharper thinking and recall
Open areaLongevity
16Slow aging at the cellular level
Open areaSkin & Beauty
27Firmer, smoother, clearer skin
Open areaFat Loss
30Lean out and manage weight
Open areaMuscle & Growth
25Build lean muscle and strength
Open areaImmune Support
16Strengthen your defenses
Open areaGut Health
4Soothe and repair digestion
Open areaRespiratory
3Support lungs and airways
Open areaSexual Health
11Libido and performance
Open areaSleep
8Fall and stay asleep
Open areaLiver Support
4Protect and restore the liver
Open areaBone Strength
5Density and fracture support
Open areaKidney Support
2Protect kidney function
Open areaMood & Stress
10Calm and emotional balance
Open areaJoints
4Cushion and mobility
Open areaCellular Energy
5Power your mitochondria
Open areaEye Health
2Vision and dry-eye relief
Open areaHeart Health
12Protect cardiovascular function
Open areaMember tools
Reference on one side. Your own record on the other.
The library is free and always will be. If you keep a personal research log, these tools live alongside it private by default, exportable at any time.
Today · MondayPrivate
Scheduled
- 07:30Morning entryLogged
- 12:00Midday noteLogged
- 21:00Evening entryDue
Vials
Vial A62%
Vial B28%
Vial C91%
Today
One screen for what is scheduled, what is due, and what was logged. Built to be glanced at, not managed.
Vial inventory
Reconstitution records, remaining volume, and expiry tracking, kept per vial rather than per compound.
Bloodwork
Panels over time, plotted against your own baseline instead of a population reference range.
Research assistant
Ask a question, get an answer that cites the tier it came from and says so when the literature is thin.
Recently reviewed
What a profile looks like.
Mechanism, evidence tier, what the strongest studies actually measured, and an explicit list of what nobody has answered yet.
Latest revisions
All profiles- Thymosin Alpha-1Thymus peptide for lung immune defense16 Oct
- Thymosin Alpha-1Thymus peptide for immune system enhancement16 Oct
- ThymulinThymus peptide for respiratory immune balance16 Oct
- ThymulinThymus peptide for immune modulation16 Oct
- TirzepatideDual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist16 Oct
- Tripeptide-1 (Growth Factor Fragment)Growth factor mimetic for skin and hair16 Oct
Independence
Nobody pays us to say anything.
A reference database is only worth reading if its incentives are boring. Ours are: members fund the tools, the library stays free, and no third party has a say in a grade.
No vendor relationships
We do not sell compounds, take affiliate revenue, accept sponsored placements, or link to suppliers. There is no version of this site where a manufacturer can buy a better grade.
No protocol recommendations
We describe what has been studied. We do not tell you what to take, how much, or when. That line is the whole point, and we hold it even when readers ask us to cross it.
Negative results kept
Trials that failed stay on the profile with the same prominence as trials that succeeded. A discontinued phase 3 programme is information, not an omission.
Corrections in the open
Every profile carries a revision history. When we are wrong, the change is dated, attributed, and visible rather than quietly edited away.
Read the evidence.
Draw your own conclusions.
The library opens without an account and without a paywall. Start anywhere the grade is always on the first line.